Out Magazine just released their December 2006 issue and as is customary for them it includes the "Out 100 List," a collection of people and events they find meaningful towards gay people over the course of the preceding year. As they describe it, it's a group of individuals who "by their life and work, demonstrate a commitment to living in truth."
Interestingly, this list is rounded out with Mark Foley, the Republican congressman accused of sending lewd and sexually-charged emails to his vastly illegal intern. As they justify, they include him "not to be perverse but for what the scandal reminds us about the oppressive and destructive nature of the closet."
I meant to write something about this back when the story happened but I got sidetracked. I can think of no better time than now, then, and this is the letter I just mailed out to the editor of the magazine:
In your December 2006 Out 100 List you included congressman Mark Foley for the reasons you chose in that article. I felt it necessary to clarify one pertinent detail about the story. Mark Foley isn't a homosexual, nor is he suffering from the same "closet" issues that haunted, for example, New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey.
Mark Foley is plain and simply a sexual predator. And as history and the news have taught us, scum like that need not be attached to a specific sexual label.
Mark Foley only became "a struggling homosexual" after the Republican spin-machine realized that the alcoholism excuse wouldn't fly. They sacrificed him to the gods of political windfall and in doing so furthered their goal by helping to reaffirm a belief held by many people in this country; namely that homosexual = an adult that will molest your children.
I expected the media to run the story provided to them, but shame on you for helping the Republicans get their work done for free. He wasn't gay, and saying he was in even a manner that soapboxes a different point about the nature of denying ones' reality destroys us more than it helps.
28 November 2006 at 10:02 pm |





